ArticlesBlog

Will the Supreme Court act differently with Kavanaugh?

Will the Supreme Court act differently with Kavanaugh?


ASHLEY? ASHLEY: EDWARD, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SO THE QUESTION IS HOW WILL MR. KAVANAUGH SHAPE THE HIGH COURT? LET’S ASK ATTORNEY MISTY MARIS, AND SENIOR LEAGUE FELLOW FOR THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION, HANS SPAKOVSKY. IF WE LISTEN TO THE CRITICS AND THOSE UPSET ABOUT HIS APPOINTMENT, ROE V. WADE WILL BE OVERTURNED.>>I JUST DON’T THINK THAT IS THE CASE AND THE REASON IS, PART OF THE CONSERVATIVE PRINCIPLES IS A BELIEF IN STARE DECISIS, UPHOLDING PRECEDENT. ASHLEY: RIGHT.>>WE HEARD JUDGE KAVANAUGH SAY THAT DURING THE COURSE OF HIS CONFIRMATION HEARING. SO TO SAY THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE JUST NOT TRUE. WHAT WE’RE GOING TO SEE, THERE IS CERTAINLY MAJORITY ON THE COURT BUT WE’RE GOING TO SEE HELD TO THE TEXT OF THE CONSTITUTION AND TO NOT HAVE A JUDGE AS A LEGISLATOR BUT JUDGE IS TO ACT IN THE UNBIASED ROLE TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION INSTEAD OF AN ACTIVIST. ASHLEY: WHAT A CONCEPT. HANS, LET ME BRING IN, HE REPLACES JUSTICE KENNEDY HOW DOES THAT DIFFER OR RESHAPE THE HOW THE COURT ACTS?>>I AGREE WITH MISTY. THE PROBLEM WITH KENNEDY HE WAS AN INCONSISTENT CONSERVATIVE. IN MAJORITY OF CASES HE AGREED WITH THE OTHER CONSERVATIVE JUDGES. A KEY FIFTH VOTE, UPHOLDING THE FIRST AMENDMENT. HE WAS A KEY FIFTH VOTE IN FIRST AMENDMENT CASES TOO, SIDING WITH
HE WAS A KEY FIFTH VOTE IN FIRST AMENDMENT CASES TOO, SIDING WITH THE CONSERVATIVES. THE MINORITY CASES WHERE HE WENT WITH THE LIBERALS ON WHAT I WOULD CALL POLITICALLY-CORRECT SOCIAL ISSUES. I THINK THAT IS WHERE YOU MAY SEE THE DIFFERENCE IN THE FUTURE. I THINK JUSTICE KAVANAUGH IS GOING TO BE A MORE CONSISTENT CONSTITUTIONALIST OR CONSERVATIVE WHO VOTES NOT WITH THE LIBERAL JUSTICES BUT WITH THE MORE CONSERVATIVE JUSTICES ON THE COURT. ASHLEY: WOULD YOU AGREE WITH THAT MISTY?>>I WOULD. I THINK HE IS A GOING TO BE A CONSISTENT, CONSERVATIVE VOICE ON THE COURT. WE KNOW THAT BECAUSE HE HAS A TRACK RECORD. WE WERE ABLE TO GO THROUGH HIS DECISIONS, LONG HISTORY, LONG CAREER TO SEE WHERE HE MIGHT GO. I THINK HE WILL UPHOLD THE PRINCIPLES HE SAID HE WOULD DURING THE COURSE OF THE HEARING WHICH IS TO RESPECT THE PRECEDENT ALREADY EXISTED. ASHLEY: NOTHING ARMAGEDDON WE’RE LED TO BELIEVE BY THOSE –>>I HARDLY THINK THE WORLD IS GOING TO END. I THINK WE’RE GOING TO SEE A CONSERVATIVE BENT ON THE COURT. IT IS TRUE, WITHOUT KENNEDY THERE IS NOT THAT SWING VOTE WE FORMALLY HAD. SOME SAY ROBERTS COULD REALLY TAKE THAT ROLE. ASHLEY: THAT’S A GOOD POINT. HE IS NO GUARANTY, IS HE? WE DON’T KNOW. HANS, I WAS READING YOUR NOTES, HE WILL ALSO ACT, MR. KAVANAUGH, REFUSAL TO CREATE IMAGINARY RIGHTS THAT FIT THE PROGRESSIVE MIND-SET. LIKE WHAT? WHAT DID YOU MEAN LIKE THAT?>>THE JUSTICE KENNEDY WAS THE KEY VOTE IN THE IN THE, IN THE OBENDORF. THEY RECOGNIZE AD RIGHT NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION AND TOOK IT AWAY FROM THE STATES. THE STATE ALWAYS HAD PREROGATIVE DECIDING MARRIAGE LAWS IN THIS COUNTRY. IT WAS BEING DECIDED THROUGH THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS. SOME STATES WERE STARTING TO RECOGNIZE IT. OTHERS WEREN’T, YET THE CUT SUDDENLY STEPPED IN AND SAID BY JUDICIAL FIAT WE’RE CREATING THIS RIGHT HE. ASHLEY: DOES HE CHANGE THE TOPIC ON GAY RIGHTS, BRETT KAVANAUGH, MISTY?>>SEE I DON’T THINK SO IF I HAD A CRYSTAL BALL, AGAIN WE’LL SEE RESPECT FOR PRECEDENT. WHAT WE MIGHT SEE NARROWING OF SOME OF THESE DECISIONS WITH CASES THAT ARE GOING TO COME UP THROUGH THE COURT.

Comments (21)

  1. The court will be free to lie and cry more.

  2. Well, yes.
    They will interpret the Law according to the Constitution and stop acting like a bunch of liberal activists.
    Thats a change.

  3. Kavanaugh is looking for payback.

  4. IT'S THEIR DUTY TO OVRRTURN BAD LAW – ROE IS BAD LAW

  5. The Supreme Courts job is not to uphold "precedents" Their job is to Interpret the Constitution as written..Hell if we used "precedents" we could still own slaves. Beat them. And kill them. You damn idiots! Please get an education in Established Legal Cases and Constitutional Law! As established law can be overturned. The Constitution requires a Constitutional Convention. To change the Law!

  6. Wellllllllllllllll, he might be PISSED!!!!!!!! for about 4 years.

  7. THE CONSTITUTION ISAFE AGAIN FOR PATRIOTS AND DANGEROUS AGAIN FOR ITS ENEMIES – 3 MORE SUPREMES TO FOLLOW – IT'S ALL OVA TRAITERS – YES SEDITION ALSO

  8. In the Summer of 1982 Feinstein bought a used Ford from the Esalen Institute. It's previous owner was a local folk-singer named Charlie. Now you know the rest of the story.

  9. I believe it will become alot more balanced SC

  10. Wow!
    Trish has really been putting away the doughnuts., lately.

  11. Russias #2 supreme Court Justice judge for American

  12. BAKER FLIPPED…THE BITCH WILL HANG..TOTALLY TRUEN.MTOTALLY TRUE

  13. The south is looking for another ass whooping this time take no prisoners two choices firing squad or hanging from the youngest to the oldest get it done

  14. He will educate the remaining liberal judges on the 2nd Amendment

  15. Yes hopefully they make it so gay marriage is BANNED all over the U.S.A. This gay country is not the country I was raised in!!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  16. Um yes, it will finally follow the Constitution instead of special interest groups, liberal groups and social justice issues.

  17. It will be a welcome change to start having judges that interpret the law as it was meant to be. I fully agree with Plutot Crever! This should never have become political and it can only be assumed that anyone or group insisting that the world is now over, are part of those that have been abusing the justice system for their personal gain.

  18. Roe v Wade is unconstitutional.

  19. deed scott was precedent and THANKFULLY overturned.

  20. Notice how the MSM plants the seeds of discord over the legitimacy of the SC now that judge K has been confirmed?? That is a classic lefty tactic used to discredit a person or an institution and even sometimes, a business. It happens when the entity does not stand with them and agree to their philosophy. As an example, other than judge K and the SC, you have POTUS, who has been portrayed in the MSM and by the lefties countrywide, as somehow being illegitimate and not duly elected.
    It is fascinating that even before judge K rules, he has been tarred and feathered and is now causing the legitimacy of the SC to be doubted. This is all hogwash!!
    Don't be fooled by the left. They are out of power and their only means to get laws enacted has been through the activist courts. Now they can't "control" the SC, so they want to sour it in the minds of the people as illegitimate. Remember, it's a tactic, not truth!!

  21. UFC fighters have nicknamed Kavanaugh SPECIAL K the great fighter!!!!

Comment here