ArticlesBlog

Richard Rhodes’s Interview

Richard Rhodes’s Interview


Cindy Kelly: We are with Richard Rhodes at
Atomic Heritage Foundation’s studio in Washington, D.C. Can you start by telling us your name? Richard Rhodes: I’m Richard Rhodes. Kelly: Can you spell that, please? Rhodes: Yes, R-H-O-D-E-S. Kelly: And Richard spelled the usual way? Rhodes: Yes. Kelly: We are trying to gather various pieces
of information about Hanford. In terms of how they came to choose Hanford,
what were the main factors that made them choose Hanford? Rhodes: General Groves had established a set
of criteria for the several locations of the Manhattan project. One was that the installations be at least
two hundred miles from a coast, because at that time it was not yet clear whether the
Germans and the Japanese were going to be attacking the United States with intercontinental
bombers, I suppose. Two hundred miles was considered a sufficient
distance – more with an aircraft carrier – to prevent a plane from reaching the site
even with them bombing out bomb sites. So that was one requirement. Then since we were going to be using large
production nuclear reactors to transmute uranium into plutonium at Hanford, or at whatever
site the general chose, he knew he’d need a large supply of water because the energy
that was produced from all this fusion wasn’t going to be used to generate electricity. There wasn’t time to worry about developing
that technology yet. It was going to be used to simply to transmute
the uranium. So all the heat had to be dumped somewhere;
therefore, he needed a large river. Then, of course, he wanted isolation. He wanted isolation for two reasons: to keep
it a secret and also in case something blew up. They didn’t know. This was new technology. It was possible that they could have some
kind of accident. So those requirements strictly limited the
choices in terms of what land was available that the federal government already owned
or could easily buy up. I think he sent out colonels who worked for
him to various places around the West. This particular site in eastern Washington
was ideal for those various reasons. The Columbia River went by. It was very sparsely populated. There were some families there who ran orchards. There was a tribe of Indians, they would have
to be negotiated with. Harold Ickes was head of the Department of
the Interior and had been a real thorn in the general’s side about negotiating or
taking land from the Indians. So that all had to be dealt with, but this
was just an ideal place for this particular type of operation. The B Reactor was the first of the big production
reactors built at Hanford to breed plutonium from uranium-238, which was the advantage
of using this technology. U-238 doesn’t fission and chain react, and
as a result it’s a kind of a poison in natural uranium because what it does do is absorb
spare neutrons coming off of fission reactions and makes them unavailable to continue a chain
reaction. For that reason it was kind of an interesting
piece of reverse engineering genius to use the poison in terms of a bomb core, the U-238
in its other purpose of making plutonium, and then realizing the plutonium would be
an even better material for a bomb than highly enriched uranium, or U-235. So that was the basic rationale for building
this operation. Using water from the Columbia River meant
the water had to be processed. You couldn’t just suck the water out of
the river. It had to be purified to a pretty high level
so that it could then run through this big box of a reactor and keep the place cool and
also moderate the neutron reaction. All sorts of support facilities were around
the reactor, including, most dramatically, the entirely remote controlled processing
system that took the slugs of irradiated uranium with their very small but valuable part of
the newly bred plutonium but also full of fission products, and therefore intensely
radioactive. The slugs would be dropped out of the reactor,
pushed through the reactor, and dropped into a big tank of water that had to be pure. Then the slugs had to be collected up by remote
control, carried on lead line casks on a remote controlled railroad, and taken over to the
other facilities where the separation process was conducted to get the plutonium – chemically
remove it from the uranium matrix. And I can say more about these other buildings,
but I thought you’d like to take it in pieces. When General Groves went looking for an American
corporation to handle this entirely new technology, I mean no one had run a nuclear reactor of
this size before. Certainly the processing of plutonium from
uranium had only been done at laboratory scale. It was really one of the amazing tasks of
the Chicago branch of the Manhattan project that they scaled up from basically micro samples
of plutonium and uranium to this enormous facility, and did it successfully. This was Glenn Seaborg who was the Nobel laureate
for having discovered plutonium itself and naming it as people do when they discover
an element. Even so, a lot of people weren’t sure at
all that even Seaborg with all his skills could make that degree of scale up a million
times or more. But he did, and it worked. General Groves went then to the company he
felt he could handle the problem, which was DuPont, the great chemical firm. DuPont was really wary. During the First World War had made ammunitions,
explosives. They had been roundly criticized afterwards
in congressional hearings, and so forth, as merchants of death. They didn’t want to be merchants of death
again with an even new and bigger explosive, nuclear explosives. Groves basically leaned on them as only General
Groves could do, and insisted they must do this task patriotically. Their final contract specified basically that
they would be indemnified against all harm, and that they would be paid a dollar a year
for carrying out this enormous operation. Basically they did it at cost. They were concerned, nevertheless, for the
health of the many, many people who worked at Hanford and tried to, within the limits
of the science of radiation health of the time, make sure that people were not exposed
to excessive doses of radioactivity. They did that, for example, by making sure
that the chimneys had vented some of the radioactive steam from their operations were several hundred
feet high, and did some meteorology to study the wind patterns to make sure that the gasses
would be dispersed to a sufficient degree to lower the radioactivity of any amount of
that gas to something that would be safe. Everyone was badged and their badges were
checked regularly to see what kind of exposures they’d had in the course of their work. At every level they could think of, they tried
to make sure that the people who were working there, and the people who lived around the
installation – there weren’t many but there were some – were not exposed to doses
more than the normal natural radioactive background in various places around the country. Nuclear fission was discovered in Nazi Germany
just at Christmas time in 1938. The news was published in a German and then
an English scientific journal early in 1939. The first experiments to see if you could
build what we would today call a nuclear reactor were done at Columbia University in New York
by Enrico Fermi and a Hungarian immigrant scientist, Leo Szilard. They very quickly realized that there was
a multiplication of neutrons if you put a slug of metal uranium into a tank of water,
and either use the water to slow the neutrons down by bouncing them around until they could
be caught by another uranium atom. You could also do the same thing with any
light element. Fermi’s first experiments toward building
a functioning nuclear reactor involved using blocks of graphite. The closest, I think, most of us come to seeing
graphite in our normal lives is pencil lead, which is fairly pure graphite. That’s what the material is. It’s greasy to the touch. It’s light, it’s mostly carbon, and it’s
a very good moderator, meaning slow, slowing-downer of neutrons. To make that nuclear reactor you need to slow
the neutrons down for technical reasons I don’t need to go into. But you can’t use the neutron as it comes
off of a fission reaction, its going too fast. It gets involved with other things that you
don’t want to have happen. In a bomb you want fast neutrons. But in a reactor you want them slowed down. So graphite very early on was considered as
a material that would help you build a nuclear reactor. In fact, Fermi called these exponential piles
that he was building “piles,” because they were literally piles of graphite blocks
interspersed with slugs of uranium arranged in a kind of a matrix, sort of a flattened
sphere plugged into these various blocks of graphite at a standard distance one from another. So if you were getting a spontaneous fission
and a piece of uranium and that produced a couple of neutrons, they would bounce around
kind of like billiard balls on a billiard table among the carbon atoms until they slowed
down enough to be captured by another uranium atom. So that’s why they were arranged the way
they were. Alright, the discovery was made in Nazi Germany. Germany had good scientists. Werner Heisenberg, most famously, was one
of the founders of quantum mechanics, one of the real revolutionaries of twentieth century
physics. He was there, a number of other good German
scientists including the radio chemist Otto Hahn and his graduate assistant Fritz Strassmann,
who would actually discover the fission reaction. Many of the scientists who began working on
the American project early in the 1940s were actually Jewish escapees from Nazi Germany. They had gotten out really just in time before
the whole Hitlerian restriction and eventually murder of the Jews had begun. But they were fully aware that they had to
get out of that country or they were not going to be able to continue, certainly, their work
at that point. So we had a fund of people beginning work
on the atomic bomb program in the United States who were not only first class physicists,
but also had intimate experience with what a Nazi regime was like. They also were aware that there were good
physicists who were not Jews left in Germany, who might well have been making the same systematic
research and discoveries that they were making about what happens with this fascinating new
reaction, nuclear fission. It worried them greatly, and it’s the reason
some of the Hungarian Jewish scientists who had come through Germany in the course of
coming to the United States went finally through Albert Einstein to President Roosevelt to
start the whole thing going. They were very worried about Hitler getting
the bomb before the rest of the world did. One of them said later the idea of a Third
Reich dominating the world for a thousand years with nuclear weapons was terrifying. The question then was: Were the Germans actually
working on a bomb? And I think the first answer is yes at the
beginning. At the beginning you didn’t start building
a bomb, you had to do the basic science behind all of this – these different reactions
at different levels of purity of uranium and different kinds of isotopes of uranium. It was an extremely complicated business to
figure out which part of natural uranium you could actually make a bomb with, and then
later with the discovery that if you irradiated uranium you could breed plutonium, a new manmade
element, and that plutonium could be used to make a bomb. These were all stages along the way, and it
took a while. But there was no reason to think that the
Germans weren’t working on the same thing that we were in this country. And if they were, and if they had started
when they discovered fission, then possibly they could be a year or more ahead. I think people don’t really understand at
this late date so many years afterwards that we didn’t build some bombs to drop on the
Japanese. We started working on atomic bombs because
we were terrified that Germany was working on atomic bombs. If we knew that whoever got there first could
dominate the rest of the world – could even reverse a defeat as someone said about the
whole German program. But at a crucial point when the Germans were
looking at the use of graphite to make, what Fermi called, a pile, a reactor, they didn’t
really understand what purity levels they had to get the graphite to in order for it
to work. If it were impure with other elements that
might absorb neutrons rather than reflecting them in a way graphite does not then they
– if they were making measurements with that impure graphite, they might come to the
conclusion that you couldn’t have a divergent chain reaction. And if you couldn’t have a diverging chain
reaction, you couldn’t have a reactor, you couldn’t have a bomb, nature would have
designed things in a way that wouldn’t make atomic bombs possible. So it was crucial that you understood that
you needed pure graphite. Evidently, the Germans didn’t understand
that for reasons I’ve not seen in the record. Perhaps their physicists didn’t talk to
their chemists. There was at least one speculation that one
of the German scientists deliberately falsified the measurements in graphite, hoping to stop
a German bomb program. I don’t think there’s really evidence
to support that. It seems to have been a mistake in the course
of developing these various components of the technology. In any case, it led the Germans to think that
they would need several tons of highly enriched uranium to make a bomb. The German scientists still believed that
as late as the announcement of the Hiroshima bomb in 1945, by which time they were confined
to a semi-prison facility in a country house in England. The war was over in Germany, they had been
grabbed by the British intelligence people, and stored away at a place called Farm Hall. They didn’t know that the entire house was
bugged. When the news came over the radio about the
atomic bomb in Hiroshima, there was a great stir among the German scientists because they
hadn’t even started working on a bomb really. And they found it hard to believe that the
United States had succeeded because they assumed it would take tons of highly enriched uranium,
which was well beyond the capacity of any country to make – would have taken, as one
scientist said, “factories large as the United States to make that much uranium-235.” So then within a couple days, Werner Heisenberg
thought it through. “Well, if the Americans had a bomb, then
that must be too much material. We must have gotten it wrong.” He started thinking it through. Within a couple days, he gave his colleagues
at Farm Hall a lecture and he had the bomb mass about right, a hundred and twenty-five
pounds of highly enriched uranium. So he thought it through, but they didn’t
think it through in 1941. In addition, Hitler was not really interested
in the atomic bomb. He didn’t understand it. He thought scientists were crazy people. He was much more excited by rockets. Thus, the V1 and the V2 rockets were built
without a nuclear warhead. To send a rocket that cost as much as a bomber
up into the sky and down on London with just an ordinary high explosive warhead was – the
British called it their secret weapon because it cost the Germans so much. Whereas, if you build a bomber theoretically
it can drop bombs, go home, blow it up, drop some more, go back and forth, much more economical
of money. So the graphite measurement – and it’s
really interesting that science works this way – the graphite measurement may have
diverted the German bomb program into the pursuit of building a power reactor, which
they decided to do rather than using graphite. But they decided to use a rare isotope of
water called heavy water, which has some neutrons in it as well as hydrogen and oxygen. It’s a very rare material that has to be
typically distilled out of thousands and thousands of gallons of ordinary water. But it has the property of reflecting neutrons
very efficiently. By the end of the war, Heisenberg and Otto
Hahn and the other first class scientists who had originally started working toward
a bomb were building a half sized nuclear reactor using heavy water and cubes of uranium
metal hung on chains, really very interesting and exotic design into this tank of heavy
water to form this matrix that I was talking about of blocks of uranium separated by a
material that would slow down the neutrons. When the American intelligence group that
was looking for these people to make sure they weren’t working on the bomb found them
in a little town called Haigerloch, they found this in a cave. They found this little half sized reactor,
which if it had been doubled in scale would have been able to go critical and actually
produce a controlled chain reaction. So they weren’t even at the stage yet where
they had their first reactor operating. General Groves was not only in charge of the
Manhattan Project but in a sense he was in charge of the whole government effort around
nuclear fission and bombs and reactors and so on. He was the General of the Army Corps of Engineers. One of his concerns therefore was: what was
the enemy doing? Where were they in their program, if any,
in relation to the United States and its program? They meaning both the Japanese and the Germans. Just to speak briefly about the Japanese,
they really never got beyond a little bit of laboratory research because they realized
that the scale of factory that they would have to build to either enrich uranium or
to breed plutonium, but particularly to enrich uranium, would use up something like one-third
of their entire national electrical supply just to operate the machinery. And it would use more than their annual production
of copper to make the wires to wind the magnets for one version of uranium enrichment. They simply didn’t see how they could make
it happen in time of war. So they never got very far. They’ve never got beyond some laboratory
research and various technologies for enriching uranium. So we can set them aside. Germany, however, was another question – again,
because we knew that the discovery itself had been made in Germany. We knew that Germany had first rate scientists. It seemed logical that Hitler, with his interest
in new, fancy new weapons would be interested in atomic bombs. So one of the things Groves did was put together
a special mission group of Army personnel and scientists. Scientists, interestingly, who were not knowledgeable
about the Manhattan Project because Groves was a very logical man. He figured if he used someone who knew about
the United States program and this man were captured and tortured by the Gestapo that
he might tell the Germans about our program. So he found a physicist who was a nuclear
physicist and knowledgeable about nuclear physics, but was not privy to the secrets
of the U.S. program. Thus, if he were kidnapped or captured and
tortured, he wouldn’t be able to tell them anything more than, “This is how neutrons
work with uranium,” or whatever. So this group, which was called the Alsos
Mission, which is a pun on the Latin word for Groves, General Groves, was sent over
to Europe. They followed just behind the lines of the
advancing United States Army as it moved toward and into and through Germany in the last months
of the war. I think in the fall of 1945 [misspoke: 1944],
the Alsos people actually started their effort. They had a couple of assignments. The most important was to find out whether
there was a Germany bomb program. Again, because Groves thought in such a logical
way – he was a real engineer, MIT trained engineer – General Groves, he wanted to
know the whereabouts of all the uranium ore, all which he knew had been in Belgium from
the Belgian Congo where there was a lot of uranium in the ground at the beginning of
the war. His logic was this: when I know where all
the uranium ore is, I’ll know that they didn’t build a bomb, because you had to
have ore to build a bomb. That’s the only source that they could have
used for their ore. So that was another task of the Alsos mission. A third task, and a very important one, was
– from Groves’ point of view – was to grab all of the German atomic scientists and
take them back to the United States, so the Soviet Union wouldn’t grab them and take
them to the Soviet Union and use them to build a Russian bomb. Groves was thinking ahead, if you will, to
what we are now calling the Cold War. So this team of people went over there and
found their way around, and the first thing they found, and I think in Frankfurt, was
a whole laboratory and a lot of documents that gave them a pretty good idea of where
the German bomb program was. Where it was was basically nowhere. They had not got beyond the idea of building
reactors, and hadn’t yet figured out how you would even do a bomb, much less move much
in the direction of actually making the crucial materials, uranium or plutonium. Then they penetrated further, and they finally
were able to track down the various atomic scientist, the Germans, and grab them – most
of them, not all of them. Some of them went – indeed, were grabbed
by an almost identical team that the Soviet Union had sent with some of its scientists
to do basically the same thing. There was a time when they were both in Berlin
at the same time, almost. I think they missed each other by forty-eight
hours. They were grabbing a bunch of very high concentrate
uranium ore that both sides knew had been stored in a particular warehouse in Berlin. The Soviet team got a few more tons than we
did, but basically they went in opposite directions and took this valuable material back to their
home countries. So the Alsos Mission was an important mission,
and by the time they were through, which was presumably close to May ’45, General Groves
had his absolute evidence in the form of uranium ore that had not been used that there was
not going to be a German bomb. You could rest easy at that point. When the Alsos Mission incontrovertibly demonstrated
that there was no German bomb program or at least no German bomb, they had been sorting
the program, many of the scientists who had worked on the Manhattan Project, particularly
the ones in Los Alamos and at the University of Chicago, particularly the émigrés, too,
from Europe whose primary concern had been they didn’t want Hitler to get the bomb,
were presented with a dilemma. Should we continue working on this weapon
of mass destruction? Our original intention has been met. We don’t need to build a bomb to have as
a deterrent against a German bomb. What do we do now? Now, most of the work by that time was finished
at Chicago and in Oak Ridge. They were wrapping up the development of the
production of uranium and plutonium for the weapons. The focus of work by the beginning of the
summer of ’45 was Los Alamos, where the scientists were actually designing and building
by hand the first three atomic bombs—the one that was tested in the desert in New Mexico
in July 1945, the one that was dropped on Hiroshima, the one that was dropped on Nagasaki. Those scientists were so busy trying to get
the job done, I mean from Groves’ point of view trying to get the job done before the
war was over. He didn’t want to have to face congressional
committee, as he said, having spent in those days two billion dollars of federal funds
– equivalent of about twenty-five billion today – on a weapon that was not ready in
time to use. He told one of his colleagues, “We’ll
all spend the rest of our lives in Leavenworth prison.” So it was important to Groves that this job
got done in time to use these weapons on the battlefield, or wherever. Those scientists were then so busy working
basically seven days a week, day and night. They really, as they said later, didn’t
have time to think through these other questions. But the ones in Chicago, and to some degree
the ones at Oak Ridge and at Hanford, had a little more time at least and could begin
to think: is this right or is this wrong? Should we use these weapons without telling
our allies, the Soviet Union? The Danish scientist, Niels Bohr, who was
one of the great philosophers of the twentieth century as well as one of the great physicists,
had come through Los Alamos in 1940, late ’43 and early ’44. He had raised the whole question of, well,
“If you’d spring this surprise on the Soviet Union, aren’t they going to feel
that you were building this as much against them as you are against Japan or Germany? Shouldn’t there be a discussion ahead of
the use of these weapons with our allies about this new and fundamental change in the scale
of potential destruction in war? Unfortunately, although he spoke – Bohr
did – with both Roosevelt and Churchill, Churchill in particular didn’t like the
idea at all, didn’t see the reason for doing it, wanted to keep his special relationship
with the United States. Remember, Great Britain was almost bankrupt
by the end of the Second World War, so Bohr didn’t get anywhere with that idea. But it was out of the ideas like Bohr’s
that this general feeling came, and Chicago particularly among the scientists there, that
we ought to at least tell the Russians. Maybe we should warn the Japanese before we
drop a huge destructive fire bomb on a civilian city. And this leads to a very complicated story
about the end of the war. But my point is simply there was a dramatic
change with the end of the war and era about: what do we now do with these bombs that we’ve
been building? And there is as well no question that General
Groves and the Army had no doubt at all that if we’re not going to use them in Germany
because Germany surrendered, we are damn certainly going to use them in Japan if the Japanese
don’t surrender. And of course we did. The problem with the use of the atomic bomb
in Japan, I think, centers on two issues that what I would call “revisionist historians”
have raised. One has to do with whether the bomb was necessary
– were the Japanese prepared to surrender just at that point? Were the bombs in some sense superfluous dropped
in the middle of the Japanese supposed effort to try to communicate an agreement to surrender
with a country with which they were at war, and therefore had no diplomatic relations? As they eventually did do, working through
the Swiss. That’s one question. The other question is: should we have dropped
these bombs on civilian cities, Hiroshima, Nagasaki? The two questions are to some degree a diversion
from what was happening at the time, which was the extraordinary resistance of the Japanese
leadership to surrendering at a time when they had been, by any measure of normal warfare,
rambling to feed it. They had no air force, they had no navy. Those had both been destroyed. They had a considerable land army on the ground
in Manchuria, but it really wasn’t going to be of much use to them if we invaded their
home islands. Their people were down to about a thousand
calories a day of the worst kind of weeds and buckwheat and anything they could get
their hands on to eat. We couldn’t understand why they were refusing
to surrender. I mean, of course it turned to some degree
on their concern that we would execute their emperor, refuse to allow him to continue to
be the titular head of the nation, the spiritual head of the nation. These were valid issues. There had been a great deal of debate within
the state department about whether or not to force the Japanese to give up their emperor
system or not. One of the state department’s leaders in
that argument was the poet Archibald MacLeish who was also an American diplomat and who
insisted we should force a democratic government on the Japanese. In the end, of course, we did understand that
the only way really to get all the Japanese soldiers still scattered around the Pacific
to lay down their arms was for the emperor to order them to. Under those circumstances, we kept the emperor
system, but at the same time installed a democratic system under that. That was the work of General MacArthur and
his team after the war. But it turns out that none of these issues
were really what was bothering the Japanese. They weren’t ready to surrender the military
leadership, and it was because they felt they still had a chance to force the United States
to more acceptable surrender terms, not an unconditional surrender as we had been insisting
on, but a conditional surrender that might give them, let’s say, some of the possessions
they’d acquired in the course of the war in Asia, for example. They imagined that if we had to invade their
home islands and they resisted strongly enough, we would take such a bloodying as we already
had on Okinawa and Hiroshima where we’d lost men to truly suicidal forces on the Japanese
side – that we would not have the stomach to continue fighting, and we’d be willing
to make some kind of deal that would be better from their point of view. Until quite recently, until just a few years
ago, I think it was the general consensus of people who’d look at the documents that
the atomic bombs did contribute to the emperor’s decision for the first time in history to
step into politics rather than to remain separate and aloof. Kind of the final person who agreed to what
the political system had already decided on and that that was the result of his horror
at the atomic bombings. A Japanese American historian who carefully
lifted the Soviet, Japanese, and American records around the turn of the twenty-first
century established, from my point of view, convincingly. But the real turning point was the decision
of the Soviet Union, which had been neutral on its eastern front against the Japanese,
to enter the war on the eighth of August, 1945. When the Japanese military realized that it
was basically now surrounded on two sides by fresh powerful armies, then they understood
that the war was over. And at that point, the emperor was able to
use the fact of the atomic bombings as an excuse for the surrender. Rather than saying “My people failed,”
he said in his speech to the Japanese people on the 15th of August, “A new and more terrible
weapon of war has been introduced into the scheme of things leading us to do the unthinkable
and agree to surrender.” So the bombs had their influence, but they
were not the decisive issue as far as why the Japanese agreed to an unconditional surrender. The other part of the question of the atomic
bombings in Japan has generally been feeling that it was somehow horrible and immoral that
we used these bombs over cities filled with civilians. The United States Air Force’s official argument
has been over the years that, in fact, because manufacturing of war materials was distributed
in Japanese cities – I mean, a lot of work went on in people’s homes with little hand
presses and lathes and so forth – that in a sense, these were military targets. I think that’s stretching it a bit. They were targets of civilians, but this takes
us back to a larger issue. In a sense, this question was decided long
before 1945. Strategic bombing was the whole elaborate
theory that was developed out of the horror of the trenches in the First World War, which
ran down the length of Europe and where twenty million people slowly died in various battles
with the front line hardly moving in either direction, a few kilometers either way for
the whole three, four years of the First World War. There was an Italian theorist of air power
named [Giulio] Douhet who theorized that if you could use planes carrying bombs, you could
basically fly over the front line and attack the civilian production of war material in
the homelands behind the lines. The theory was that if you caused enough destruction
that the people would rise up in revolution, overthrow their warlike leaders, and sue for
peace, which I think never happened in the history of strategic bombing. It certainly didn’t happen in Spain during
the Spanish Civil War when this city busting technology was actually first tried out by
German forces fighting on the side of Franco. Places like the famous town Guernica, where
they deliberately fire bombed the city to utter destruction. It had nothing in it at all except some peasants
who’d come to market that day. But the Germans were trying out the technology
because they believed the theory. Let’s face it. It gave the air force something to do. So our Air Force, the United States Air Force,
had been active all through the Second World War enlarging the technology of strategic
bombing. The fact that the Germans first tried it out
in Spain in 1937 and 1938 came back to haunt them during the Second World War, because
we systematically destroyed city after city in Germany with firebombing techniques that
occasionally would start a mass fire like a tornado where the fire is coalesced into
one huge fire sucking in air from around the edges of the fire storm and having a chimney
up in a cycle like that that basically burned out everything organic for square miles around. When we then got to the question of what to
do with Japan before we had invaded the home country, the Air Force wanted to use its technologies
to help win the war, of course, and tried precision bombing of factories. But no one knew at that time about something
called the jet stream. The new big B-29 bombers that had just come
into use in Japan in 1944 were flying at twenty-nine and thirty thousand feet and bombing from
that altitude, not really understanding that the wind of the jet stream was going to blow
them ten or fifteen miles off course. The Japanese had a sort of joke at one point
– the Japanese could be very ironic about the destruction that was being visited upon
them. One of the first attempts of strategic bombing
north of Tokyo, the bombs landed in Tokyo Bay. The Japanese joke was the Americans are trying
to drown us. So pinpoint bombing didn’t work. The logical next step was then to go to area
bombing. By April of 1945, Curtis Lemay and his fleet
of several thousand B-29s were flying almost wingtip to wingtip at five thousand feet below
where the Japanese anti-aircraft guns could target, just systematically dropping incendiaries
to make kindling, dropping fire bombs to start fire storms, and burning out Japanese cities
one after another. The largest death toll in any single city
in Japan was in Tokyo in April 1945, the first of the big fire bombings when there happened
to be a very high thirty knot wind blowing across the city that started a huge fire storm. Killed easily a hundred, maybe two hundred
thousand people, burned them to death that one night in Tokyo as a result of this six
pound incendiary bomb technology. By the time the atomic bombs were ready at
the beginning of August 1945, the US Air Force was down to Japanese cities of less than fifty
thousand population. Everything else was already destroyed. For the people who were developing the bombs
and for the Air Force, these bombs didn’t seem to be larger in order of magnitude of
destructive capability than these massive fire bombings that has already been going
on. The one difference, of course, was that the
bombs would produce radioactivity. They were deliberately built with timers that
would send them off at eighteen hundred yards above ground so that the fire ball that forms
when a nuclear explosion occurs would expand, would not touch the ground in the course of
its hot expansion. Touching the ground, of course, would have
irradiated dirt and soil and made a very intensely radioactive mess all over the city that would
have killed a lot of people with radiation. We didn’t want to do that. We wanted these bombs to work just like the
incendiary and high explosive bombs that the air force had already been using. We wanted blast and fire, but not radiation. There was very little actual radiation other
than the immediate prompt radiation from the fire ball at either Hiroshima or Nagasaki. Most of the deaths – people, I think, don’t
realize this – most of the deaths were from fire because of this mass fire storm that
the bomb started in both cities. So from the perspective of the military using
atomic bombs in August 1945 in the pursuit of ending the war was not different morally,
and I dare say wasn’t different morally, from what had already been going on all over
Europe, had been going on all over Japan. It’s what we had been doing for a long time. If there was a moral decision, that was made
back in’43 when we switched in Europe from trying to do pinpoint precision bombing, which
we couldn’t do for various technical reasons, to mass area bombing with the concomitant
civilian casualties. It’s a very important point, because school
children these days have this kind of package that they go through, the trial of Harry Truman,
the impeachment of President Harry Truman for atomic bombing the Japanese. But I mean, if that were going to be a realistic
experience for these school children, they should go back to Guernica. They should go back to Hamburg. They should go back to when this really started
and find out why. It wasn’t because we were just bad guys. It was because we had a problem, a very difficult
military problem to solve. So it’s irrelevant, from my point of view,
how many lives were saved of American troops that would have been lost had we invaded the
Japanese home island. Those issues that historians have squabbled
about now for forty years, the question is what were they trying to do, had we done it
before? And the answer is yes, we had, we’d already
worked all that through. This was just more of the same. The discovery of how to release the energy
locked up in the nuclei of atoms was a discovery as momentous as the discovery of fire. It’s a big statement, but I think it’s
valid. Nuclear energy was the first major source
of energy humankind had found that does not directly or indirectly depend on sunlight. Coal ultimately derives from sunlight. Wood, of course, there’s a bit of energy
in the geothermal drilling down deep into the earth. But that’s actually driven by nuclear fission
of uranium and the decay of uranium atoms in the core of earth believe it or not, which
is why it’s still around after all these billions of years. It would have cooled long ago if there weren’t
some active process making new heat down there and the process is actually decay of elements
similar to fission. So here was this new deeply fundamental change,
as Niels Bohr put it, in the course of human affairs destined, as he understood, almost
immediately to bring fundamental changes to things you would not think of in terms of
energy. The relationship between nation-states was
affected, because if two countries have nuclear weapons, they just simply can’t go to war
with each other. If they do, they’ll destroy each other. That’s not the point of a war. The point of a war is to win a victory of
some kind, one side, and the other side loses. But if both sides are destroyed, the war is
pointless. There’s a reason why we have had no world-scale
wars since 1945. I think that reason is the introduction of
this fundamental change in our relationship with nature called the discovery of nuclear
fission, and the course of time, the application of fission to making fusion work, hydrogen
bombs, if you will. I’m not saying the weapons themselves keep
the peace, although for some time now that’s the way we played it, but at great risk. I am saying that the fact that this technology
makes it possible to have Mutually Assured Destruction as it was called, whether it’s
at the level of knowing how to build these weapons or at the level of actually having
arsenals full of them. That’s made a deep and fundamental change
in human affairs. Who did this? How did this happen? At the beginning it happened because of a
very unusual profession and kind of knowledge and way of approaching knowledge called science. Science traditionally has worked by what anthropologists
call gift exchange. That is to say, if I make a discovery in the
course of my research as a scientist I publish the results. That’s how I got credit for them. My work doesn’t pay me other than whatever
I might earn as a university professor or someone in a laboratory, or whatever. So the payment is in the reward, the recognition
for having made a discovery. You can see this in the fact that a lot of
elements are named after their discoverers. That’s really something very special. There are only ninety-two on the periodic
table of naturally formed elements on earth. So I’d give the world the gift of the knowledge
of this discovery I’ve made. Other scientists who read these journals take
that knowledge, and if they’re working in a similar field close to mine, they may use
that to begin looking further into that part of the natural world. That may lead to another discovery which they
then publish, and then I take that. I use that to further my work. So science is an open world, as Bohr called
it, of gift exchange among people who share knowledge in order to advance knowledge. That meant that when fission was discovered
in Nazi Germany in December 1938, Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann, the two radio chemists
who made the discovery, published a paper about that research, how they did that, and
what the results were. That paper was first published in a German
scientific journal which was read all over the world. And then the further refinement of the information
was published in the British journal “Nature.” Scientists everywhere in the world who were
working in nuclear physics immediately, really immediately, within a week or two, realized
you could probably build a nuclear reactor. Using this new discovery, you could probably
build an atomic bomb. Research programs started up in France, in
Germany, in England, in the United States, in Japan, everywhere that the science of nuclear
physics was far enough advanced that there were scientists capable of understanding the
discovery research begun on it and what it meant and how it worked and how you might
make it do more than just split and atom and so forth. In fact, interestingly, one of the ways the
Soviet Union scientists realized that the United States was working on an atomic bomb,
once that program began 1940, 1941, was when the papers of all the famous nuclear physicists
in the United States stopped appearing in the journals. They stopped giving away their information
because now it was a military secret. One of the more astute Soviet scientists,
“Hmm, they must be working on a weapon.” So this process of sharing knowledge in order
to advance science meant that there was a kind of international community of scientists
who were knowledgeable in this field. Adolf Hitler made the really deeply stupid
mistake, he and his colleagues, of deciding that this kind of physics was somehow besmirched
and Jewish. All of this was an artifact of the fact that
physics in the nineteenth century was somehow construed by German philosophers to be sort
of a materialistic science, not as spiritual as, I don’t know, whatever they were working
on, archaeology or whatever. As a result, it was one of the few fields
of science that Jews were allowed to study at the university. Nobody else really wanted to because it was
looked down upon as somehow vulgar and Jewish. So the results having been worked on by Jews
of the level of intelligence of Albert Einstein were discredited in some way in the official
Nazi cannon of rules about who’s good and who’s bad in the world as Jewish physics
and not of interest really. More importantly, when the Hitler regime came
into power in 1933, they nationalized all the universities making all university professorships
and other positions civil service positions. Then they passed a law that said no Jews in
the German civil service. Thus, basically every Jewish scientist in
all the universities in Germany was out of a job. They couldn’t find any other work either. So what could they do – they could immigrate. There were non-profit organizations in England
and in the United States and universities that realized these were first-class scientists
and wanted to come to their universities in their countries. In this way, toward the end of the 1930s just
before the beginning of the Second World War, Great Britain and the United States acquired
a whole cadre of really, really Nobel laureate level scientists, if you will. People like Hans Bethe, people like Eugene
Wigner, and many others besides Einstein, who had come over years before. As a matter of fact, he’d realized earlier
than most what was brewing in Germany and didn’t see any reason to stay. So these immigrants arrived in England and
the United States, grateful to these countries that had been willing to accept them and to
incorporate them into their communities of science and generally of life. They were all the more prepared and concerned
to help their newly adapted countries build the bomb ahead of what they presumed was a
German bomb program. When you went to the various parts of the
Manhattan Project, whether the original place in New York City at Columbia University, where
they were working on both a potential nuclear reactor and also possible ways to separate
out the bomb material part of uranium from the poison part of uranium, the U-235 from
the U-238; or at the University of Chicago, where they were basically working on the whole
chemistry of plutonium, whether you could build a reactor, and if so, if you could use
the material in that reactor to breed plutonium for a bomb; or a bit later Hanford or Oakridge
and Los Alamos, which the Corps of Engineers then built in order to actually make the materials
and design the weapons themselves. These were rich collections of people from
many different countries with a basic core of born American citizens working with these
people from around the world. I don’t think it would have been possible
to build a bomb, certainly not before the end of the Second World War, without the vital
contribution of all of these various immigrants who joined the program. There was a crucial point in the program at
Los Alamos in the summer of 1944 when it was realized that plutonium – of which you needed
a lot less than highly enriched uranium to make a bomb – was so fissile that if you
tried to use the standard design that was going to be used for the uranium bomb – which
was basically a three inch navy cannon about six feet long with one piece of uranium attached
to the muzzle, and another piece was a sort of bullet fired up the barrel to meet with
other piece to make the critical mass and start the bomb going – that if you tried
to do that with plutonium, they discovered that summer this piece would melt down before
it even got up to the other end of the barrel, even if it were fired at three thousand feet
per second. That’s how reactive plutonium was. Then they realized that they were going to
have to invent an entirely new technology, one that would involve taking a solid ball
of plutonium that was just subcritical, not quite enough to start a chain reaction – which
is a function not only of the geometry and of the state, whether it’s a metal or an
oxide or something, but also of the density of the metal – that they were going to have
to figure out a way to take a solid ball of plutonium, squeeze it with high explosives
to a greater density, almost double its normal density. In other words, squeeze that ball until instead
of being about this big it’s only about this big, thereby pushing the atoms of plutonium
closer together and making the chain reaction possible, making, if you will, the critical
mass much smaller because its denser. Somehow they were going to have to do that,
and they were going to have to do it in about eight months if they were going to be ready
with a plutonium bomb. If they weren’t going to be ready with a
plutonium bomb, they would only have one bomb in August of 1945 because it was such a laborious
process to make highly enriched uranium out of natural uranium that that’s all the uranium
they’ve been able to accumulate by August of 1945 – about 125 pounds, enough for one
gun bomb, the bomb that was used on Hiroshima. Then they needed some help with some complicated
mathematical calculations that were involved in figuring out how to shape big blocks of
high explosive in such a way that a divergent explosion, like most explosions, can somehow
be turned around and focused inward on a point, which would be the center of this ball of
plutonium. If you build your shaped charges and use explosives
that burn at different rates, some fast, some slow, you can actually do that. But the geometry was immensely complicated. There were no computers yet. They needed brains to do the computing. There weren’t enough people at Los Alamos
who were busy working on the gun bomb mostly to get the job done. At that point they turned to the British. Another whole contingent of immigrants to
Britain from Nazi Germany and other parts of Europe plus the British scientists themselves
arrived at Los Alamos to help out, and obviously got the job done. Indeed, the person who really did the geometry
of that bomb was the famous Hungarian mathematician John Von Neumann, who had the mathematical
skills without a computer to help to figure out the complicated geometry of this new system. It was so uncertain even then that the system
would work, and there was enough spare plutonium available that they tested that bomb. That was the first atomic bomb explosion in
the desert in New Mexico on July 16th, 1945. This was a work of many people. Not only at the level of the scientists – factory
workers came in, young women who had been living in Tennessee through the depression
came in to run these giant machines that were using magnets and other systems to enrich
uranium. They weren’t even told what the machines
did. They were put in front of a giant gauge with
a needle and tell them to keep the needle between those two points. Don’t let it go outside by spinning these
dials. They got very, very good at it. In fact, I talked to people who worked at
Oak Ridge in these basically factory jobs, and they said the depression was so boring. There wasn’t anything to do. We didn’t have any money. We couldn’t even afford to go to the movies. Then suddenly, here was this interesting work. We had tennis courts. At night they took down the nets and they
turned them into dance floors. I mean, there were a lot of babies conceived
at these places around the country in the course of the Second World War. General Groves, at one point, called Robert
Oppenheimer in Los Alamos and said, “You’ve got to stop these people having so many babies. They’re overrunning our hospital system
here. We don’t have room for them all.” Oppenheimer said something like, “General
Groves, that’s outside my bailiwick. I don’t really have any control over that.” So this was a time of great excitement, a
time of great purpose, a time for many of realization that particularly the young men
who were involved, the scientists, for example. The average age at Los Alamos among the scientists
was something like twenty-seven. Oppenheimer was only in his mid to late thirties. They were a very young crowd. They understood that if they weren’t there
working on this special weapon, they would be on the front lines in Iwo Jima or in France
or in Germany. They would be risking their lives in another
way. And they took that very seriously. They realized that other lives depended on
the work they were doing because they did believe, and I think correctly, that when
these bombs were built, the war would be over. As Oppenheimer told them, maybe all wars would
be over. So at every level, excitement, intensity,
a feeling of responsibility, a feeling of great moment in the work they were doing,
all of which was quite true. They were doing something absolutely revolutionary. And it did change the way the world has worked
ever since. One of the persistent, I think, misapprehensions
about the development of the atomic bombs is that in some way, if the scientists had
all gotten together, they could have decided, “Oh, let’s keep this a secret. Let’s not tell anybody about it. This is not a good thing for the world. It’s going to cause a lot of trouble. Let’s just go home and stop working on this.” But science doesn’t work that way. First of all, on the larger scale, if you
stop scientists from communicating with each other – something General Groves had a lot
of trouble with during the war, because he wanted to compartmentalize everybody and let
them only know what they needed to know to do their specific part of the job. That worked fine for the women who were running
the big dials at the factory down in Oak Ridge, but it wouldn’t work with the scientists,
because they had to communicate their discoveries to each other in order to continue pursuing
the cutting edge of what they were doing. Similarly, when nuclear fission was discovered,
it was published. The information about the discovery was made
public. That’s the way science works. But also there wasn’t a war on that. There was no reason that anybody might have
thought of to keep it a secret. Once they realized that there was a weapon
possible and once the war began, then the work that was done subsequent to that point
was indeed kept secret. Much to the detriment in the short-run of
the development of the science and nuclear physics, but that all got straightened out
at the end of the war. The point is this was knowledge – science
had reached that point, the science of nuclear physics. People had been working for about three years
on this mysterious mix of stuff that happened when you bombarded your solution of uranium
nitrate with neutrons. All sorts of radio activities would come out
of it, different elements would come out of it as you sorted through this material, and
people didn’t understand what was going on. Once the discovery was announced, everyone
who had been working in the field ran to their laboratories, grabbed some equipment off the
shelf, ran the reaction, and there it was – then kicked themselves for not having
made the discovery. I remember talking with Glenn Seaborg, later
the Nobel laureate for the discovery of plutonium. Seaborg spent three days, he told me, in an
absolute blue funk. He was an immensely ambitious man. He wanted to make real changing discoveries
and to have missed this one that was right before his eyes because he just didn’t know
what he was looking at galled him terribly. But it was only once that discovery was out
there that everyone then immediately realized that they were on the verge of discovering
it anyway. If it hadn’t been discovered in Berlin in
December 1938, it would have been discovered at Berkeley or in Paris or in Cambridge, England. Everybody was there because they were all
working together. We’re all familiar with the phenomenon of
two labs coming in with almost identical results three hours apart from each other, or two
days. The priority goes to whichever one got the
news out first. That’s the way science works. People are working right on the edge of making
these discoveries. So to say that if these guys had – once
this discovery was made they all could have gotten together and said, “Let’s forget
about it,” is simply, frankly ignorant. It just doesn’t comprehend the way science
works. If, on the other hand, you decided that all
scientific discoveries should be kept secret until their moral and ethical possibilities
are examined by whomever would be credited with doing that, well, then science would
stop. Because it’s by knowing what other discoveries
have just been made in a particular field that you’re able to make the next advance,
and the next advance. So Niels Bohr, who is really a hero of mine,
once said that the goal of science is not power over nature, which is what we tend to
think of it as. It’s rather, he said, “the gradual diminution
of prejudice.” And that sounds innocuous until you start
thinking about it. He’s talking about the prejudice that the
earth is at the center of the universe, which most of the world believed until Galileo and
Copernicus, and so forth, proved definitively that the sun is at the center of our little
solar system. And that we’re just on the edge of a lot
of other galaxies and stars and so forth. That had enormous philosophic consequences
for the world. It was part of the dethroning of the belief
that we were a special creation of God just a little lower than the angels. Well, that was some prejudice that people
were relieved of that the earth was at the center of the universe. We’re still wrestling, at least in the United
States, with the question of whether we are a special separate creation or whether indeed
we evolved along with the other mammals and primates as Darwin would have it. That’s still an active debate in the United
States 150 years after Darwin. So the gradual alleviation of prejudice. There was a prejudice up until 1945 that nation-states
were absolute entities. That at their boundaries, if there was a question
about what was theirs and what wasn’t theirs, they could go to war with other nation-states
and that the outcome of such a conflict would define the absolute sovereignty of the nation-state
again. Well, you can’t go to war with nuclear weapons
with another nuclear power. That meant, essentially, the end of world-scale
war since 1945. It also meant that the absolute sovereignty
of the nation-state had been compromised. It’s no longer possible to determine your
rules over some other country’s rules by going to war with them if they have nuclear
weapons and you do, too. We see this all the time in – well, in the
wars the United States has fought since 1945. We were prepared to lose the war in Vietnam. The chief negotiator of the Vietnamese government,
when he talked to Henry Kissinger at the Paris peace talks, said, “We knew we could win
because we knew you wouldn’t use nuclear weapons on us.” Everything else we had within our power to
do, we were determined to win this fight. So the very simple discovery of releasing
nuclear energy led to the continuing evolution of fundamental changes in the relationship
among nations and peoples around the world which is not nearly finished yet. That’s not something that you can put in
a box and shove away in the back of a closet.

Comment here