Ocean Acidification — Changing Planet

Ocean Acidification — Changing Planet

In Antarctica, few animals can survive the howling
winds and frigid temperatures up on the land, blanketed by snow. But here, in the Southern
Ocean, under the serene cool blue ice cover, Antarctica is teeming with life. In these
frigid waters live creatures that would feel right at home in a 1950s monster movie: giant
sea spiders, jellyfish, anemones and sea urchins. GRETCHEN HOFMANN (University of California
– Santa Barbara): They’re living in water that’s so cold that you can’t even put your
hand in it for five seconds without feeling extraordinary pain. It’s just like right above
the freezing point of seawater, it’s so cold. THOMPSON: Today, the ability of these animals
to survive in sub-freezing waters is being tested by a new threat: ocean acidification. HOFMANN: The Antarctic and the Arctic are
thought to be possibly some of the more vulnerable marine ecosystems to climate change. And they
might be the first in time to really have acidic waters meet the organisms that live
there. THOMPSON: What’s making the oceans more acidic?
Scientists blame the carbon dioxide created by the burning of fossil fuels. The CO2 goes
into the atmosphere, but as much as thirty percent is then absorbed by the oceans. The
more carbon dioxide, the higher the acidity. THOMPSON: Initially, scientists welcomed this
absorption of carbon dioxide by the oceans, because they believed it would reduce CO2
concentrations in the atmosphere. But as the oceans take in carbon dioxide, now the question
for scientists is, how much is too much? ANDREW DICKSON (Scripps Institution of Oceanography):
We knew that we were burning things to make energy and that carbon dioxide, some of it,
was ending up in the oceans. And for many people that was seen as a good thing. What
we’re recognizing is that there are changes in the composition in the oceans. THOMPSON: In the last 150 years, as CO2 has
increased in the atmosphere, the pH of ocean surface waters has dropped by around 0.1 pH
unit. That’s a 26% increase in ocean acidity. And the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change predicts an additional drop of 0.2 to 0.3 pH units by the end of the century.
That’s a 100- to 150% increase in ocean acidity since before the Industrial Revolution. THOMPSON: As the ocean becomes more acidic,
it makes it harder for marine animals that build their shells out of calcium carbonate,
like corals and oysters. At the University of California, Santa Barbara, scientists are
studying the effects of higher CO2 on sea urchins. HOFMANN: We mix the carbon dioxide into our
seawater tanks to mimic future high CO2 oceans, levels that we thought we go to in a hundred
years or something. And we do start to see effects at those high numbers, in terms of
slowing down their growth. They are a little bit smaller at any time in development. And
also, there are some effects on fertilization, we think, when water gets really acidic. THOMPSON: Not far off the coast of U.C. Santa
Barbara, ocean acidification could have a direct impact on people who make their living
harvesting sea urchins. BRUCE STEELE (Diver): My name is Bruce Steele.
I’m a commercial sea urchin diver. I work at the Channel Islands, which are up here
off the coast. THOMPSON: The boom for sea urchin sushi started
with the Japanese back in the 1980s. Now the uni crop brings the state of California over
$100 million a year and provides essential jobs to hundreds of divers and processors.
But the changes to ocean chemistry have them worried. STEELE: The problems that were seeing with
animals like sea urchins or oysters are kind of a harbinger of problems that might be going
on in the open ocean. THOMPSON: Two recent events clearly show that
ocean acidification has already arrived on western shores, and could have a direct impact
on the seafood we eat. In 2007, Science magazine reported that surface water in places along
the California coast was already more acidic than researchers predicted. Around the same
time, news reports started trickling in from oyster hatcheries in Oregon and Washington
State. Millions of larvae were dying. The culprit: ocean acidification. DICKSON: It seemed that it was actually the
change in the chemistry of the seawater that was killing the larvae. THOMPSON: The massive die-off alarmed both
the seafood industry and scientists. In California, they joined forces to do something about it.
Theyre sharing data and standardizing water measurements to determine which species are
most vulnerable. HOFMANN: There’s a crew of us, the oystermen,
the fishermen themselves, scientists, and other people in the community are getting
together and asking, how can we work together to address some of these growing economic
issues? THOMPSON: Back in Antarctica, where scientists
predict acidic conditions will be felt first, the options for Gretchen Hofmann’s sea urchins
are quickly dwindling. HOFMANN: It’s kind of like a double-edged
sword. They’ve learned to live in a really cold environment that stays cold all the time.
And then here comes climate change, so the ocean is going to warm and the pH is going
to change. And where are you going to go? Where can you migrate to that’s colder, if
you are an Antarctic urchin? Well, nowhere, actually. THOMPSON: Since the beginning of planet Earth,
animals have adapted to changing conditions. But adaptation can take thousands, even hundreds
of thousands of years. Now, with millions of tons of carbon dioxide going into the oceans
every day, can the creatures of the sea change quickly enough to survive in the changing

Comments (7)

  1. I had never thought about this.

  2. We have to hope that peak oil hits us before we do any permanent damage to the planet. Because people are, apparently, unwilling to do the right thing on their own.

  3. If the ocean became acid, I'd drink a lot more water.

    Lysergic diethlymide acid ftw!

  4. Seriously, though, just a couple of thoughts; if the ocean became more acidic, wouldn't it also corrode the land faster?

    Also, why not just dump an ass load of an alkali in the seas? Sure, it wouldn't work as a long-term solution, but it might buy us a bit more time to research and find a decent, effective solution that's more eco-friendly and will last longer?

    I think the best way, in all honesty, is to pump lots of funding into nuclear fusion research. Cleaner energy that removed the need to

  5. removes the need to… burn carbon fuels to create energy – means less CO^2 and less acidification.

  6. HAIKU

    I hatch! Crawl! And swim!

    Oh how I love my sweet life,

    But—why’s the sea so warm?

    —A Green Sea Turtle

  7. more acidic give me a break. The ocean has a pH around 8 according to their own information here. That is a long way from being acidic. There is no acid water in the ocean and never will be because it is buffered by the geology of the earth..and other things. You can add acid to it however much you like and it will still remain an alkali. An acid has the ability to donate H+….while ocean water is alkaline and mops up H+. More scare mongering.

Comment here